EXECUTION & JUDGMENT
Analytics & Data Judgment
Whether you use data to change a real decision, not just to report on one -- choosing the right metric, reading it correctly, and knowing when the data is not enough to decide.
← All 16 dimensions in the competency frameworkWhat strong evidence looks like
- A specific metric or analysis, what it revealed, and a decision that changed because of it
- Acknowledges where the data was ambiguous or insufficient, and what was done about that
What weak evidence looks like
- Citing metrics that were tracked but never used to change a decision
- Treats a dashboard or report as the outcome itself
A real follow-up question
“What did the data say that surprised you, and what did you do differently because of it?”
Questions like this follow directly from what you just said, not from a fixed script -- they exist to find out whether an answer holds up, not to check a box.
Related dimensions in Execution & Judgment
See where you actually stand on this
A self-assessment only goes so far. The adaptive interview tests exactly this kind of evidence, in your own words, with follow-up questions built to find out whether it holds up.